Tuesday, March 18, 2008

Farmers, farm workers, and eaters (us)


Long-term participation in and solidarity with alliances of farm workers, farmers, rural women's organizations, indigenous organizations and movements are for some the key to building a movement capable of creating that Other World to which so many aspire. (A protest at McDonald's by Committee of Immokalee Workers activists and supporters is pictured.) What are the challenges and joys of living into relationships of mutuality, long-term solidarity, and informed advocacy with and on behalf of those most directly impacted by structural economic injustices, racism, exploitation and oppression? How is a tomato consumed from the garden a link in the web of transformation we all pray for? What is God asking of us now?

-- Stephen Bartlett

Monday, March 17, 2008

Guatemala


Crescent Hill began connecting with folks in Guatemala in earnest a couple of years ago, when Pastor Jane Larsen-Wigger returned for a visit and Pastor Carlos Lara Gabb came to preach and pastor us for several months. Last summer a group of 19 Crescent Hill folks visited an Eastern Guatemala area on the shores of the country’s largest lake, Lago Izabal, where most folks speak an indigenous Mayan language, K’ekchi. Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) mission folks helped connect us with folks in a group of six congregations that were part of the PC(USA)’s partner Evangelical Presbyterian denomination there. We helped build cement floors in houses and led youth, women’s children’s, and elders’ and deacons’ workshops. (A group of children who intereacted with us in connection with one of our construction projects is pictured above.

Guatemala is one of the poorer, more dangerous countries in Latin America, with water we couldn’t drink, machine gun-toting security guards, and a history of inequality, civil war, and military rule. The country also features a vibrant, growing Protestant culture, with hospitality, joyous worship, and a yearning for greater scriptural literacy and theological depth.

We left with an idea of building a longer-term partnership, but mediocre relationships between the PC(USA) and the Evangelical Presbyterian church in Guatemala, low budgets, and other pressing demands have us wondering whether it’s something that we can pursue. The PC(USA) Guatemala Mission Network next meets in Guatemala City in November, and we have considered sending some folks to that meeting with hopes that they can connect with Izabal area folks either in Guatemala City or back in El Estor.

Communication remains a serious challenge. Some of us speak Spanish but others don’t. None of us speak Kek’chi. The mail service we’re told is not trustworthy. Although everyone has cell phones there we haven’t established phone contact. And although we’ve gotten an e-mail address for one person, that person would have to go to the Internet cafĂ© regularly (and be able to afford to do so)

These were a very hospitable group of people who I personally would love for us to build deeper relationships with. Guatemala is such a rich country and yet such a poor country, only five or so hours flying time away, and we have a chance to work with folks with growing congregations who don’t see North Americans all the time. In addition to consulting with Izabal Presbyterians (not an easy task), however, we would need more people interested, perhaps with more time and money, and/or some financial investment by the church as a whole in this.

-- Perry Chang

Appalachia/Eastern Kentucky/environmental justice


Following the summer of Pastor Jane Wigger's sabbatical in which we heard music, teaching, and preaching on Appalachia, adults and youth from Crescent Hill participated in two environmental education tours of Eastern Kentucky. We met local residents such as Sam Gilbert who told us about his battle to preserve his land from the encroachment of mountaintop removal mining. We viewed a film about the sludge pond disaster that contaminated all the water in the Big Sandy river basin and learned of advocacy efforts by Kentuckians for the Commonwealth. During the day, we hiked in pristine areas such as Lilley Cornett Woods which contains old growth forest and some of the greatest species diversity in the United States. At night, we joined residents for a bluegrass concert and square dance. On Sunday, we worshipped with folk at Isom Presbyterian Church.

Not long after our trip, some of us formed an environmental justice group to study ways in which we could be more environmentally responsible with our use of energy and natural resources. The energy we consume derives from coal, and thus, has a direct bearing on the lives of those we met in Appalachia whose wells have been contaminated and house foundations have cracked due to blasting from mountaintop removal.

As a church, we'd like to continue our dialogue about how we might partner with people in Appalachia--what we might learn and receive from people like Sam Gilbert, and what we might have to offer.

-- Leslie Townsend

One on ones: Going deeper


Outline for some of the presentation that the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) Community Ministry staff person Phil Tom (pictured to the left) made to the deacons, elders, and others and the activities he led on Wednesday, February 20:

Why do one-on-ones?
1. To build and deepen relationships
2. To uncover self-interests
3. To gain clarity about yourself
4. To gain some information about the other person

Respond to the following questions (20 minutes total - 2 minutes each):
1. Where did you grow up?
2. What challenges did you face?
3. What from your growing up impacts you now?
4. What led you to your current vocation?
5. How does your faith impact your vocation?

Doing one-one-ones is not doing counseling, but to build public relationships. Public relation information is never used for personal gain.

Go deeper II [we didn't get to this]
Spend another 30-45 minutes picking up "bits" from the first conversation.

So what is a "one-on-one" or "relatoinal" meeting?

It's a face-to-face conversation between two people for the explicit purpose of exploring and developing a relationship. Done well, it's a conversation grounded in passion, vision, stories, and self-interest, NOT in issues and programs. At the end of the day, the goal is to increase the power of the organization (congregation) by getting the person - who presumably has somethign to offer (passion, a following, etc.) - to join the collective.

Probing vs. prying

You don't do relationship meetings for chit-chat. Nor do you get into them with the goal of selling something - membership or affiliation with your organization. Intead, you're going after a person's core, their spirit. You want ti know what makes them tick. Your'e looking for the personal stories behind their public persona. When probing, the most radical thing you can do is to ask the person "Why?" "Why teach?" "Why do you do social justice work?" To reiterate, relational meetings are NOT an indiscriminate search for information. You're looking for something very specific - talent, passion, vision, and energy.

- Adapted from the Center for Community Change Fair Immigration Movement's "Ten Rules for On-on-Ones/Relational Meetings"

Saturday, March 15, 2008

Next steps


What did I like most about the Epiphany celebration on January 6th, a great breakfast event that focused on mission in partnership? I’d say – the connections we made about the kind of relationships we want to have. In various ways, we said that what we want for our relationships in our own homes and church, we also want for our relationships with people in other places such as Smoketown, Appalachia and Guatemala.

The marks of good relationships are nicely distilled in a pamphlet called “Presbyterians Do Mission in Partnership,” and they include: “shared grace and thanksgiving, mutuality and interdependence, recognition and respect, open dialogue and transparency, and the sharing of resources.”

At the beginning of our Epiphany event I talked some about why there is so much interest in partnership. Good reasons include:

A. Respect for what God does in lives other than our own
Faith in Jesus Christ reveals to us that we are “co-heirs” of God’s grace, none of us having earned it, and all of us gifted as members of “the body of Christ”.

B. Respect for the variety of contexts
In partnerships, we acknowledge that the people already in each place have a lead role because of their understanding, and because they will live with the results.

C. Hope for transformation, growth in discipleship and “new creation”
Being in a discipline of partnership helps keep our own culture from dominating, opening us to more rapid and profound work by the Holy Spirit and to unimaginable adventures.

D. Hope for an enduring, positive impact

No changes “take” unless embraced by and rooted in the persons who can make those changes endure. In partnership, one discerns what can become embraced and grounded.

Then we heard from Ben Langley, who shared moving reminiscences of his experiences in the Dominican Republic (DR) where he learned from his hosts and found himself transformed by that relationship. He was then better able to help other people enter into mission cooperation with the church in the DR.

About half of our time was in table conversation. The notes reveal insight and experience in how relationships can evolve to be the basis for the kinds of person-changing and world-changing we believe God has in mind. Words used repeatedly included: patience, perseverance and prayer; asking and listening; and humility and humor. Participants also emphasized being clear about one’s own expectations and motivations, staying in a learning mode about how different people express (or don’t) what they really want, building trust, and taking the time to share in what another’s life is (or working with people who have already done that).

Many said that long-term partnership relationships that acknowledge God’s love can “stretch” us, help us learn to ask and receive, and heal us, make us more whole.

The people who pulled this event together shared, I think, a sense that the mission involvements of CHPC members reveal a longing for this kind of conversation. The fact that 70-80 people participated just confirms that. The deep insights that surfaced that morning showed (and “epiphany” means “showing”!) that CHPC-ers have a longing for integrity that will “carry us a long way” on our journey with God. Please be part of the conversation about “next steps”!

-- Marian McClure

Epiphany celebration small-group discussion notes

First Discussion Question: Most of us have had the experience of thinking we knew someone well enough to know what he or she wanted, only to find out we were mistaken, and the potential for error is increased by differences of language, culture, and socio-economic status. In forming mission partnerships that involve such differences, what are some ways to foster a really mutual relationship of understanding and care?


Group 1: Ways to foster mutual relationships – listening; clarifying (intention to really want to know them), openness; not judging (assumptions), automatic responses – not necessarily helpful – need time to swallow and digest first (need patience); denial (want it to go differently – [must be] willing to let go of control; freedom to speak up and disagree; knowing [our] purpose is to work together; must want to work together – allow for differences in expectations (working in groups [?])

Group 2: What is imposed won’t endure. Do not create dependency – always need a degree of ownership and control [on the part] of the people being served; Even the people [closest to us] we don’t [really] know – we assume reactions and responses based on our [own] personalities. We assume we are the mean - Our frame of reference is to compare things to what we know; There is a sense of being uncomfortable because of others’] customs and expectations; Show that you are trying and are watching; Demonstrate [an interest in a] ministry of presence; Ask others what they need – they won’t [necessarily] initiate.

Group 3: Listening involves forming trust – Understand the meaning of love and respect in each culture; Understand the status and power differences already evident in other groups; Listen for evidence that others do or do want help/dialogue; Use lots of humor; Listen using respectful actions (“don’t mess with each other”); Acknowledge their [spoken] words – also [use/watch for] body language and expressions; [Ask:] Can we eat together? Understand . . . [eating] customs; Listen for what they need – Use humor – Look at eyebrows, hands, and pitch changes. People don’t always mean what they say – study others’ culture

Group 4: Immerse yourself in learning culture and language; Recognize that we [at Crescent Hill; in the United States] are not with greater wisdom; Learn to listen/step back; Be sensitive to why we are there; [Stress -] learning [and] developing relationships; Put aside our feelings about how things need to be or [how things need to be] fixed; Recognize and understand the reasons why things are as they are; Avoid alienating partners you need by ignoring what they need; Place value on these relationships; Apply these values to other areas of your life; Can’t discount everything that was there before.

Group 5: Story about remote control cards (from Doug Yeager); Come to the table and listen (listen to see if your ideas get any traction); Careful balance of putting things on the table and letting someone else pick things up [or not?]; If we’re coming from different experiences, you also have to give input (sewing machine story); Another story: no electrical infrastructure to support cooking items given to coop in Mexico; Other stories (redecorating – gang issues – color choices) (coats children – couldn’t wear) – Must do research; (Holly) didn’t think decorating was important, but kids convinced her of its importance; Easy to get stuck in cross-cultural communication – bring in ideas as suggestions; We must be giving from our perspective.

Group 6: [Be] patient, waiting – Ideas [may] ripen, whereas our culture tends to rush; Concentration of work in mission – Don’t spread ourselves too thin because there’s so much complexity; Don’t assume we see the priorities of “recipients,” and make sure they are in the leadership and on their way to becoming the givers, not the recipients; Use what already in you [?]; Let distant mission enlighten you about what needs to be done in your own community; Remember that some people have great trouble accepting assistance, but really do need help; Learning to ask for help may be a key in mission.

Group 7: We need to be listening … for differences. Observing is a way around this; Don’t take the lead – small steps could be a contribution; It’s the type of mind[set] to listen (with a “humble” mind); Listening takes time; Ask what they need; Have a spiritual openness” – so that going to minister we may be ministered to; Get to the root of the problem – Don’t just address symptoms; Developing trust – takes time; See people as people, not as problems.

Group 8: [We] desire to be helpful but [sometimes take] wrong actions (for example, donating tuxedos to a clothes closet; designated giving to low priorities; donating junk that no one can use). Most Western countries want to “do”; most Eastern folks want relationships first and activity second (exactly the reverse of Western culture); building relationships is paramount. Working in partnership is more time-consuming than just “doing something,” and so we get frustrated at the lack of progress. Shot-term [mission tripping] is inferior because there is little opportunity to get to know people. Individual or small-group travel – preferable – because large groups are too constricting and too intimidating for the partner.

Group 9: What are ways of fostering understanding? Try to learn as much as possible first (have to have deep knowledge); Ask first: Is this something we should be doing? Make a friend you can trust; Hang out with ears open and mouth shut – absorbing culture; Find a mentor who is trusted by the community – this person can be your gatekeeper; Joint decision-making (not just accepting a suggestion from the most powerful community member); Must “park” pre-conceived notions; Have patience – Recognize others’ sense of time; Persevere in relationships (try to focus on long-term relationships); Include follow-up in planning; How do we focus on true transformation? Real transformation takes time, sometimes many missions, or many decades – It’s hard to overcome our habits and our inertia; Look at mission as a journey, not a one-hit wonder, not a “trip”; Give ideas of how to extend commitment and how to continue the journey
Second Discussion Question: You may be able to imagine someone, somewhere buying a Christmas present for, say, a spouse or a sibling that you think they probably will like, but it is really something you want. It is very important to be aware of one’s motivations. What are your motivations for ‘doing mission’? What do you think you will get out of it? More broadly, how do you think this congregation will benefit?


Group 1: Seeing others is our suffering too; To alleviate suffering is to alleviate our own suffering; Seems futile [to attack suffering] and easy to give up; The causes of suffering are embedded in structures even bigger than we are; Don’t deny our own aggression (sports arenas are cultural phenomena); People want to believe in things (for example, British soccer fans [?]);

Group 2: Our perspective changed in a way we didn’t expect; What has been very helpful: Having other come to us (Immokalee workers; Soila) [Not to make lists of the differences between us, but what unites us - the love of God)

Group 3: Wanting to know people and know them better; Learn differences; [Make] friends in a community; Keeps us humble to what’s out there; Adjust expectations – set up for disappointment; Like the spontaneous, unexpected learning and joy; Deal directly in relationships, not “through” someone; Building trust to lay the foundation for joy; Leads us from talking to doing and learning; Validating our reason for being; Helps us discover internal motivations;

Group 4: Reward-oriented society – sometimes [there] is no personal reward; Know others well enough to know what they want or need – this is very hard and can make mission efforts go wrong; Are you listening – really listening? [One doesn’t] always get a thank you; Finding the role of prayer in this; Pray to show us the way; Taking us out of our comfort zone; Our congregation does a lot in this area – creates comfort; Recognizing that this may be intimidating to “newer” people; Recognizing each others’ passions and supporting them instead of trying to recruit them (?); Can’t rest on what we have already done; Heightened awareness; Mission creates greater wholeness in a fragmented society and expands out of our comfort area.

Group 5: Building relationships – giving/receiving; Being present/listening; (Sharing (?)) hopes and dreams; Foster child – who had been in institutions for past 2 ½ of his 5 years. Very violent, self-destructive, impulsive child. Everyone had ideas. Day program at Caritas kicked him out – School wouldn’t take him either. They therefore had him 24 hours a day. He liked computer games. Beth sat by him on another computer hour after hour and that was what he needed. After eight weeks with Beth constantly there – same person; same place – He could go into school. She had to be where he was. They needed to have hope and notice little signals. They could tell he was listening. Stopped and spent time building a relationship – That was what mattered. Being with someone, to learn what was wanted/needed.

Group 6: Share love of Christ – share/receive; accompaniment/solidarity – agricultural mission (Dan Bliss – melt needs of the world); Appreciation of universal human experience – “Washington bubble” – example of disconnect from those one serves – Christ love – antidote; Connection between someone and “others” – find similarities as examples of universalities; Missions – being open to the surprise of God; Missions – healing the worker/receiving from God; Change of venue/atmosphere/change “time” paradigm – open to healing by going from U.S. time – to “garden” or “Appalachian” time; Benefits – learn to view time differently; Learning to let people help; Example: Tuesdays with Maury – example that at end of life – total dependence allows us to receive/know the love and care of those around him/us. Proposed summary: Mission= Sharing time with others – receiving/sharing true communication; changing our view of time – open to receiving from the one who loves us enough to give us each other.

Group 7: We want to share the things we have, things we can do; It’s been our tradition - we have a history of mission; We want to be of service; We need to be aware of our motivations; It makes it [church?]a more welcoming place people want to be among others.

Group 8: Building relationships – not a new concept (Egyptian retreat center – 1960s [?]); Have eyes opened – see others and myself more clearly; Tension between/balance of activity/relationship-building; How to sustain relationship beyond a short-term mission trip? Establish relationships with others who are engaged and participate in a mission network; Look for individual opportunities as well as more group efforts to extend relationships.

Group 9: Keeping us grounded; giving us perspectives on materialism and distractions from spirituality in our culture; How do we incorporate our learnings from mission into our own lives? There are many opportunities – how do we rein ourselves in and choose where we put our emphasis? The ongoing relationship will continue to give to us [?]; My personal call may be somewhere else; how do we support mission without having the time or financial resources?; We need to remember the power of prayer; Offer several options for people to choose from – join a limited number of missions; narrow the focus; Write a check! If you have no money, write a letter! Knit a hat to give away; Avoid giving people a guilty conscience; Mission strengths our faith; Mission gives us a way to say “thank you” for all we have received.